The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study (2025)

Abstract

Objectives: Physiotherapists are encouraged to set goals together with their patients to deliver client-centred care. In practice however, this goal-setting process is poorly specified, with limited patient involvement. The Patient-Specific Complaints instrument (PSC) can support the goal-setting process. Despite its being frequently used by Dutch physiotherapists, its actual role in goal setting is unknown. The objective was to examine physiotherapy goal-setting and the use of the PSC within this process, as well as the physiotherapists' perception of the usefulness of the PSC.

Methods: Consultations between physiotherapists and patients were observed and physiotherapists were interviewed. Data were analysed by directed content analysis, using a goal-setting framework as the coding scheme whose phases include: goal negotiation, goal setting, planning, and appraisal and feedback.

Results: The patients' problems were comprehensively explored, with the PSC focussing on activity problems. Goal-setting and planning phases were poorly specified and mainly physiotherapist-led. The physiotherapists appreciated the PSC for patient involvement during goal negotiation and evaluation. Its perceived usefulness for goal setting and planning ranged from useful for tailoring goals to the patient's needs to not useful at all. One major reason to use it was meeting external audit obligations.

Conclusions: There are some discrepancies between how physiotherapists use the PSC and how they perceived its usefulness. Physiotherapists did use the PSC in a goal-setting process, though often as a standalone tool without integration in the whole physiotherapy process, and with limited patient involvement. In this way, its full potential for goal setting is not utilized. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-31
Number of pages9
JournalMusculoskeletal science and practice
Volume27
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Goal setting
  • Physiotherapy
  • Patient-specific measurement instruments
  • Client-centred care
  • OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE-MEASURE
  • LOW-BACK-PAIN
  • OUTCOME MEASURE
  • STROKE REHABILITATION
  • FUNCTIONAL STATUS
  • DETAILED ANALYSIS
  • PHYSICAL-THERAPY
  • DECISION-MAKING
  • RESPONSIVENESS
  • FEASIBILITY

Access to Document

  • Full text Final published version, 408 KBLicence: Taverne

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this

    • APA
    • Author
    • BIBTEX
    • Harvard
    • Standard
    • RIS
    • Vancouver

    Stevens, A., Moser, A., Koke, A., van der Weijden, T., & Beurskens, A. (2017). The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study. Musculoskeletal science and practice, 27, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.005

    Stevens, Anita ; Moser, Albine ; Koke, Albere et al. / The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study. In: Musculoskeletal science and practice. 2017 ; Vol. 27. pp. 23-31.

    @article{c038342d3f114c42a2e4545eae113938,

    title = "The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study",

    abstract = "Objectives: Physiotherapists are encouraged to set goals together with their patients to deliver client-centred care. In practice however, this goal-setting process is poorly specified, with limited patient involvement. The Patient-Specific Complaints instrument (PSC) can support the goal-setting process. Despite its being frequently used by Dutch physiotherapists, its actual role in goal setting is unknown. The objective was to examine physiotherapy goal-setting and the use of the PSC within this process, as well as the physiotherapists' perception of the usefulness of the PSC.Methods: Consultations between physiotherapists and patients were observed and physiotherapists were interviewed. Data were analysed by directed content analysis, using a goal-setting framework as the coding scheme whose phases include: goal negotiation, goal setting, planning, and appraisal and feedback.Results: The patients' problems were comprehensively explored, with the PSC focussing on activity problems. Goal-setting and planning phases were poorly specified and mainly physiotherapist-led. The physiotherapists appreciated the PSC for patient involvement during goal negotiation and evaluation. Its perceived usefulness for goal setting and planning ranged from useful for tailoring goals to the patient's needs to not useful at all. One major reason to use it was meeting external audit obligations.Conclusions: There are some discrepancies between how physiotherapists use the PSC and how they perceived its usefulness. Physiotherapists did use the PSC in a goal-setting process, though often as a standalone tool without integration in the whole physiotherapy process, and with limited patient involvement. In this way, its full potential for goal setting is not utilized. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",

    keywords = "Goal setting, Physiotherapy, Patient-specific measurement instruments, Client-centred care, OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE-MEASURE, LOW-BACK-PAIN, OUTCOME MEASURE, STROKE REHABILITATION, FUNCTIONAL STATUS, DETAILED ANALYSIS, PHYSICAL-THERAPY, DECISION-MAKING, RESPONSIVENESS, FEASIBILITY",

    author = "Anita Stevens and Albine Moser and Albere Koke and {van der Weijden}, Trudy and Anna Beurskens",

    year = "2017",

    month = feb,

    doi = "10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.005",

    language = "English",

    volume = "27",

    pages = "23--31",

    journal = "Musculoskeletal science and practice",

    issn = "2468-7812",

    publisher = "Elsevier Science",

    }

    Stevens, A, Moser, A, Koke, A, van der Weijden, T & Beurskens, A 2017, 'The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study', Musculoskeletal science and practice, vol. 27, pp. 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.005

    The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study. / Stevens, Anita; Moser, Albine; Koke, Albere et al.
    In: Musculoskeletal science and practice, Vol. 27, 02.2017, p. 23-31.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study

    AU - Stevens, Anita

    AU - Moser, Albine

    AU - Koke, Albere

    AU - van der Weijden, Trudy

    AU - Beurskens, Anna

    PY - 2017/2

    Y1 - 2017/2

    N2 - Objectives: Physiotherapists are encouraged to set goals together with their patients to deliver client-centred care. In practice however, this goal-setting process is poorly specified, with limited patient involvement. The Patient-Specific Complaints instrument (PSC) can support the goal-setting process. Despite its being frequently used by Dutch physiotherapists, its actual role in goal setting is unknown. The objective was to examine physiotherapy goal-setting and the use of the PSC within this process, as well as the physiotherapists' perception of the usefulness of the PSC.Methods: Consultations between physiotherapists and patients were observed and physiotherapists were interviewed. Data were analysed by directed content analysis, using a goal-setting framework as the coding scheme whose phases include: goal negotiation, goal setting, planning, and appraisal and feedback.Results: The patients' problems were comprehensively explored, with the PSC focussing on activity problems. Goal-setting and planning phases were poorly specified and mainly physiotherapist-led. The physiotherapists appreciated the PSC for patient involvement during goal negotiation and evaluation. Its perceived usefulness for goal setting and planning ranged from useful for tailoring goals to the patient's needs to not useful at all. One major reason to use it was meeting external audit obligations.Conclusions: There are some discrepancies between how physiotherapists use the PSC and how they perceived its usefulness. Physiotherapists did use the PSC in a goal-setting process, though often as a standalone tool without integration in the whole physiotherapy process, and with limited patient involvement. In this way, its full potential for goal setting is not utilized. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    AB - Objectives: Physiotherapists are encouraged to set goals together with their patients to deliver client-centred care. In practice however, this goal-setting process is poorly specified, with limited patient involvement. The Patient-Specific Complaints instrument (PSC) can support the goal-setting process. Despite its being frequently used by Dutch physiotherapists, its actual role in goal setting is unknown. The objective was to examine physiotherapy goal-setting and the use of the PSC within this process, as well as the physiotherapists' perception of the usefulness of the PSC.Methods: Consultations between physiotherapists and patients were observed and physiotherapists were interviewed. Data were analysed by directed content analysis, using a goal-setting framework as the coding scheme whose phases include: goal negotiation, goal setting, planning, and appraisal and feedback.Results: The patients' problems were comprehensively explored, with the PSC focussing on activity problems. Goal-setting and planning phases were poorly specified and mainly physiotherapist-led. The physiotherapists appreciated the PSC for patient involvement during goal negotiation and evaluation. Its perceived usefulness for goal setting and planning ranged from useful for tailoring goals to the patient's needs to not useful at all. One major reason to use it was meeting external audit obligations.Conclusions: There are some discrepancies between how physiotherapists use the PSC and how they perceived its usefulness. Physiotherapists did use the PSC in a goal-setting process, though often as a standalone tool without integration in the whole physiotherapy process, and with limited patient involvement. In this way, its full potential for goal setting is not utilized. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    KW - Goal setting

    KW - Physiotherapy

    KW - Patient-specific measurement instruments

    KW - Client-centred care

    KW - OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE-MEASURE

    KW - LOW-BACK-PAIN

    KW - OUTCOME MEASURE

    KW - STROKE REHABILITATION

    KW - FUNCTIONAL STATUS

    KW - DETAILED ANALYSIS

    KW - PHYSICAL-THERAPY

    KW - DECISION-MAKING

    KW - RESPONSIVENESS

    KW - FEASIBILITY

    U2 - 10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.005

    DO - 10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.005

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 28637598

    SN - 2468-7812

    VL - 27

    SP - 23

    EP - 31

    JO - Musculoskeletal science and practice

    JF - Musculoskeletal science and practice

    ER -

    Stevens A, Moser A, Koke A, van der Weijden T, Beurskens A. The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study. Musculoskeletal science and practice. 2017 Feb;27:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.005

    The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A qualitative study (2025)
    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Recommended Articles
    Article information

    Author: Melvina Ondricka

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6021

    Rating: 4.8 / 5 (68 voted)

    Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Melvina Ondricka

    Birthday: 2000-12-23

    Address: Suite 382 139 Shaniqua Locks, Paulaborough, UT 90498

    Phone: +636383657021

    Job: Dynamic Government Specialist

    Hobby: Kite flying, Watching movies, Knitting, Model building, Reading, Wood carving, Paintball

    Introduction: My name is Melvina Ondricka, I am a helpful, fancy, friendly, innocent, outstanding, courageous, thoughtful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.